Friday, February 24, 2012
There are Lies, Damned Lies and BBC News
Hang on a second what's this "Assistant Chief Constable Terry Sweeney said police were aware of "tensions in the borough"
Hmm wonder what might have caused this tension, I suppose it's all the gangs of white racists roaming the area. Or maybe, just maybe it could be this.
Well of course it is and plod tried to hush all this up asked the press not to report on the trial in the name of social cohesion. The BBC and the rest of the MSM duly obliged. How the hell does hiding the sins of one sector of the community help social cohesion? The people in Rochdale know what is going on, they live there. Suppressing the reporting of this was only ever going to cause problems. With the internet you can't hide stuff like this anymore, well not for long.
If the allegations against these men are true then what they have been up to is absolutely vile and should be fully exposed. By colluding in keeping this quiet and refusing to give it the prominence it deserves the MSM is saying to the victims, their families and the white community that what has been done to these children is unimportant, they don't matter. Maybe this was an attempt to get some reporting of the matter. MSM only started mentioning it when it hit the blogs and the net, not a dickie bird before that.
This is by no means the only case of this type that plod and MSM have tried to cover up there's this and this and this and many more and it's not like nobody knew or anything.
I often wonder if the MSM strategy of under-reportuing or ignoring completely "bad news" stories involving minorities is a deliberate attempt to foster resentment when the story eventually leeks out. When you have a society with elements at each others throats it's easier for governments to increase police powers and take away our freedoms.
Anyway one thing is for sure this is not a news story, it hides more than it tells and it is deliberately skewed to conveniently hint that one of the BBCs pet hates, the EDL, was behind it all.
While I am having to take BBC news to task yet again have a look at this story, another paedo, a councillor of no political party it would seem. But as we all know if a BBC story about a politician does not mention a political party then they are sure to be Labour. Sure enough Councillor Mark Burton was a Labour Councillor.
Did you spot the nasty little barb in the story?
Specialist officers also found file-wiping software which digitally shredded documents he had held on his computer.
Don't like the suggestion that having proper file deletion software on your computer is an indication that you are a paedo. How long till plod is fitting up people as paedos just for having file shredding software on their machine?
BBC news is now completely and utterly untrustworthy. You want the truth about what is going on in the world you'd be better off asking your neighbours cat.
BBC News has still not covered this at all.
Update ----
I see the always readable Ambush Predator has also written about this here. Interesting that her peice which went up at 8:20 this morning refers to a part of the BBC report which is no longer there -
" The disturbances coincide with the trial of 11 men from Rochdale accused of having sex with girls under the age of 16. They all deny the charges."
The most relevant bit of the report deleted, what more is there to say?
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Mr. Potato Justice Head Bean
Mr Justice Bean, (presumably a friend of Mr Potato Head) it seems, is so stupid and ignorant of the law he can't identify a crime, even when shown videotape of one being committed.
Mrs. Somerville got all those nasty looking cuts and bruises by accidentally walking into a door apparently. Hmm, shades of "he fell down the police station's stairs, your honour." only less convincing.
I wouldn't mind being the next lawyer defending a yobbo in front of Judge Bean when plod produces CCTV footage as evidence.
As usual I have questions :-
1. What about the officers who grassed Andrews up? Exactly how hellish will their lives become when this yob is inevitably reinstated?
2. Will it be possible for anyone to be held in contempt of any future court over which the contemptible judge Bean presides?
3. Is Mr. Justice Bean one of the many public figures caught in Operation Ore whose name was never made public by the police? Or did he simply do a deal over outstanding speeding tickets?
4. Why are the judiciary hammering so hard on the wedge currently being driven between plod and public?
I see the Andrews fan club that is Gadget's blog (no, I'm not linking to the T shirt pushing, sheep worrier) is over the moon that their hero got away with it. He's one of their own, and most women deserve a good slap now and then anyway.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Reading, Writing and Rioting
There seems to be lots of conjecture about exactly what happened and who was to blame. It looks pretty straightforward to me.
A bunch of naive students were led into a orgy of violence and damage by NUS leaders and leftist infiltrators. Behind the scenes numerous "right on" older students (aka lecturers) were pulling the levers Wizard of Oz style. Par for the course really.
The lack of action on behalf of plod to stop this "riot" is simply Paul Stephenson saying to the Cameron slime "Threaten to cut my budget would you?". For that the slime should get rid of him, along with all the other chief police officers appointed under labour. But the boy doesn't have the cojones, does he?
I agree with many other bloggers who are saying that perhaps the trashing of CCHQ while plod mostly stood by and watched will give the slime some idea of what the rest of have to put up with. Unfortunately political slime doesn't think like that.
Finally, what about the police who were injured, well sad to say I don't really care. Go back a very few years and would have felt sorry for the officer pictured below. I would have been in the camp demanding that the perpetrator be found and punished. Today the only feelings I have towards police officers injured yesterday is meh!
Friday, October 29, 2010
How Many Thugs in Blue
About a dozen apparently!!!
This happened in August 2010. None of these rogue rozzers has even been suspended over this.
Merseyside's finest even tried to charge the victim with Assault on Police. Funny I can't see any police officers in the video. All I can see are thugs in uniform.
How many times can a plod punch you on the back of the head, while you lie restrained on the ground before it goes beyond reasonable force?
I'm sure the Chief Thug of the Merseyside force is livid about this, all those yobs attending one incident when they could have been fining motorists or beating up other drunken people.
The violent plods in this video are scum and so are the senior officers who are covering for them. Doubtless Mr Grace will receive a lump of taxpayers money for his pains and the "officers" involved will receive words of advice and move on to their next victim.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Rogue Rozzers

Is it Paul Whitehouse on a bad hair day?
Is it a bad female impersonator?
Is it a tramp who just scored a new suit at the local Sue Ryder shop?
No, this apparently is a Superintendent of police and a Detective Superintendent at that.
Charlie McMurdie is head of Met's Police Central e-Crime Unit (PCeU) and according to The Register she seems to have been a very naughty lady plod. According to Judge Sandra Pontac the lovely Charlie told bare faced lies under oath at an employment tribunal in an attempt to cover her arse and that of her side kick Detective Inspector Kevin Williams.
This sort of behaviour by police officers no longer surprises me, especially when it involves the Met. It is merely demonstrates how increasingly dishonest the police are becoming. I also suspect dear Charlie may be another example of someone being promoted way beyond their capabilities for the sake of political correctness.
It will be interesting so see how the Met deal with the allegations. The judge made her remarks on the 13th October (as far as I can work out). That's almost a week ago I would have expected the alleged "criminal" to have been suspended, or possibly even arrested and bailed while an investigation was carried out. After all that is what would happen to me or you (any visiting plods excluded natch).
Strangely I can't find anything about this on the BBC news site, I'm not the best searcher but somehow I just know they are very unlikely to cover a story about the bad behaviour of an over promoted, unmarried woman of Miss McMurdie type.
It seems it is not only the beeb which is neglecting this story. Coverage by the dead tree press is somewhat thin. The Independent has coverage of the earlier hearings in the case but not the latest developments.
The final two paragraphs of the Indy story are real gobsmackers:-
"DI Williams received "words of advice" – the lowest form of disciplinary action in the Met police – for cheating and instigating false disciplinary proceedings, and was recently appointed to a counterterrorism role."
Words of Advice and a posting to a cushy anti-terrorism post for cheating his way into a job and starting false disciplinary proceedings against a fellow officer to destroy his career. You try lying your way into a job. If you get caught and the company calls plod they may well try to have you up for Obtaining Pecuniary Advantage by deception. Words of bloody advice.
A police spokesman said: "The Met encourages staff to challenge inappropriate behaviour and report wrongdoing so it can maintain high professional standards, and the trust and confidence of staff and the wider community."
And in reality, grass someone up and you are finished my son. "Maintain high professional standards", Jesus H Christ on a tricycle the bloody Pakistan Cricket team know more about high professional standards the this lot.
I suppose we should be grateful that this allegedly mendacious cow and her dodgy sidekick have only cost us tax payers £38,000 plus the real cost of the trial. At least this time some poor sap isn't going cold on a slab or lying bleeding in the corner of a police cell.
Mind you if Not Very Tall, Bald Paul had his way, there wouldn't have been a tribunal for this bitch to lie to.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Not Very Tall, Bald paul
Cunningly the ex-Tesco shelf stacker has included an idea to circumvent employment tribunals. Presumably so that he doesn't have to compensate any Christians/Hindus/Budhists/Jews sacked for wearing symbols of their religion while shoveling compo at the likes of this fine example of police officership.
Finally the folically challenge, potential retifist has decided that all these damned FOI requests are putting too much embarrassing information into the public domain. So he's come up with a wizard money making wheeze to make us pay to see the information our taxes already paid for. A bit like a bank charging you to withdraw your own money.
Presumably when he finds out what the blogs are saying about this he will want obstacles placed in the way of bloggers. Six feet of earth I imagine.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Crack Down On Me NOW Baby

Yes, YES, YES.
Oh my goodness what an excellent idea. I do so hope we get this where I live soon. It will finally give me the opportunity to report all the people who I think shouldn't be on the road. I would urge you all get behind this initiative.
I wonder if this is one of Mr. Cameron's new wheezes, it does sound a bit Big Society or am I getting my societies mixed up with my brothers again.
Just to give you some idea of how great this will be here is a short list of the some of the types of people I will consider reporting on a daily basis.
Every police vehicle and tallyvan.
Every doddery old twat holding up the fast lane.
Every lorry with a "this vehicle is limited to 40 Mph on single carriageway" sign.
Every twat riding a horse on a road.
Every tractor, agricultural vehicle and JCB.
Every person who drives with their headlights on during the day.
Every vehicle with a foreign number plate.
Every vehicle containing someone who looks like they might be a member of the religion of peace and a backpack.
Every vehicle with the EU flag on its number plate, or anywhere else.
Every vehicle with GTI on the back*
Every vehicle with a "Dads Taxi", "Baby on Board" or other stupid sign or sticker.
Every woman driver who can't see over her steering wheel.
Every sad twat that drives like he is in the BMW he really wanted while he's actually driving the people-carrier his wife made him buy.
Every vehicle in which I can see a cuddly toy.
Every driver that won't let me out at a junction.
Every vehicle which I think needs a good wash.
Every vehicle which looks too clean.
Cars parked on the drives of houses bigger than mine.
Every driver I see wearing a hat in car.
Any lorry driver I see not wearing a shirt.
Any vehicle which I suspect may be connected in any way to the BBC.
Absolutely every caravaner and dormabile, moving or parked.
Anybody who looks at me funny.
And, of course my boss and that pillock from accounts who keeps querying my budget.
Anyone not on the above list.
Oh but revenge will be so sweet. Imagine the poor sap, standing there getting well and truly told off by an officer of the law. Unless of course he realises that the best course of action is to invite the officer to lay any charges and evidence before a court and then tell him to get the hell off your property.
They did say these were annonymous reports didn't they? What could possibly go wrong with such a brilliant idea?
* Did you know that the man who invented the term GTi was dyslexic?